https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249507 The dispute concerned refusal to appoint an arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The parties later filed a joint application naming a retired High Court Judge as arbitrator, and the Court accepted that mutually agreed arrangement without entering into the merits of the controversy. The impugned order refusing appointment was set aside, and the dispute was referred to the named arbitrator. en-us Tue, 01 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:56:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249507 The dispute concerned refusal to appoint an arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The parties later filed a joint application naming a retired High Court Judge as arbitrator, and the Court accepted that mutually agreed arrangement without entering into the merits of the controversy. The impugned order refusing appointment was set aside, and the dispute was referred to the named arbitrator. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249507