<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 543 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249506</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the AO&#039;s decision to reject the assessee&#039;s self-assessment of a residential flat under the Wealth-Tax Act, 1957. The Court held that &quot;practicable&quot; under Rules 3-7 of Schedule III should be construed widely, allowing the AO to invoke Rule 8 when the taxpayer&#039;s valuation is absurd or lacks correlation to fair market value. The AO&#039;s discretion must be judicially exercised and objectively reasonable. Here, the AO justifiably rejected the self-assessment due to wide variation between market value and municipal tax-based valuation, the property&#039;s use as a guest house, low municipal ratable value, and the assessee&#039;s own agreement to sell for significantly higher amount. The referral to the Departmental Valuation Officer under Section 16A was proper, and wealth tax assessment based on the officer&#039;s valuation was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2025 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 543 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249506</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the AO&#039;s decision to reject the assessee&#039;s self-assessment of a residential flat under the Wealth-Tax Act, 1957. The Court held that &quot;practicable&quot; under Rules 3-7 of Schedule III should be construed widely, allowing the AO to invoke Rule 8 when the taxpayer&#039;s valuation is absurd or lacks correlation to fair market value. The AO&#039;s discretion must be judicially exercised and objectively reasonable. Here, the AO justifiably rejected the self-assessment due to wide variation between market value and municipal tax-based valuation, the property&#039;s use as a guest house, low municipal ratable value, and the assessee&#039;s own agreement to sell for significantly higher amount. The referral to the Departmental Valuation Officer under Section 16A was proper, and wealth tax assessment based on the officer&#039;s valuation was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>