<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 389 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165455</link>
    <description>The High Court acquitted two respondents, a manager and managing director, in an appeal against their conviction under Section 120-B IPC read with Essential Commodities Act and Iron and Steel Control Order. The court emphasized the lack of evidence proving their direct involvement in selling pig iron at inflated prices. The absence of proof linking them to the sale led to their acquittal. The appellant&#039;s argument for their conviction under Section 10 of the Essential Commodities Act was dismissed as the company itself was not found guilty of the offense, absolving the respondents of liability. The appeal was consequently dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 389 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165455</link>
      <description>The High Court acquitted two respondents, a manager and managing director, in an appeal against their conviction under Section 120-B IPC read with Essential Commodities Act and Iron and Steel Control Order. The court emphasized the lack of evidence proving their direct involvement in selling pig iron at inflated prices. The absence of proof linking them to the sale led to their acquittal. The appellant&#039;s argument for their conviction under Section 10 of the Essential Commodities Act was dismissed as the company itself was not found guilty of the offense, absolving the respondents of liability. The appeal was consequently dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>