<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 534 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249497</link>
    <description>Reassessment under the U.P. Trade Tax Act requires objective, relevant material showing a rational nexus with escaped turnover; a mere conjecture or subjective assumption is insufficient. The recorded reasons here treated broken glass as a waste product allegedly obtained from filling factories, despite the assessee&#039;s consistent case that it had purchased broken glass from kabaries and was only a trader. The distinction between waste product and waste material was material, and the reasons did not establish a live link between the material relied on and any escapement of turnover. The sanction to reopen the assessment was therefore invalid and the reopening could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 534 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249497</link>
      <description>Reassessment under the U.P. Trade Tax Act requires objective, relevant material showing a rational nexus with escaped turnover; a mere conjecture or subjective assumption is insufficient. The recorded reasons here treated broken glass as a waste product allegedly obtained from filling factories, despite the assessee&#039;s consistent case that it had purchased broken glass from kabaries and was only a trader. The distinction between waste product and waste material was material, and the reasons did not establish a live link between the material relied on and any escapement of turnover. The sanction to reopen the assessment was therefore invalid and the reopening could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>