<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 533 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249496</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the orders demanding interest and penalties. The respondents were directed to refund the amounts deposited by the petitioner if not already refunded. The court emphasized that the exemption notification aimed to support new industries and should not impose undue burdens on the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 533 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249496</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the orders demanding interest and penalties. The respondents were directed to refund the amounts deposited by the petitioner if not already refunded. The court emphasized that the exemption notification aimed to support new industries and should not impose undue burdens on the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>