<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 532 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249495</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals filed by New Kishan Cement and Major Cement, setting aside the impugned orders dated 25.3.13 and 31.03.13. The penalties imposed on other parties were also set aside, along with the revocation of Central Excise Registration for Hindustan Exports, Jayshree Vyapar Ltd, Karan Chemicals, and Karan Marketing. The decision emphasized procedural fairness, proper evidence handling, and the right to cross-examination in adjudicatory processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 14:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 532 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249495</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals filed by New Kishan Cement and Major Cement, setting aside the impugned orders dated 25.3.13 and 31.03.13. The penalties imposed on other parties were also set aside, along with the revocation of Central Excise Registration for Hindustan Exports, Jayshree Vyapar Ltd, Karan Chemicals, and Karan Marketing. The decision emphasized procedural fairness, proper evidence handling, and the right to cross-examination in adjudicatory processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>