https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249490 The Tribunal directed the Applicant, a manufacturer of MS Ingots, to make a pre-deposit of 25% of the duty involved within eight weeks, despite arguments of financial hardship and lack of concrete evidence presented. The case involved allegations of suppression of production and clandestine clearance, with the Department relying on input/output norms and comparisons of yield percentages. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the evidence presented but emphasized the importance of compliance with the order, indicating the balance dues would be waived, and recovery stayed during the Appeal's pendency. en-us Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249490 The Tribunal directed the Applicant, a manufacturer of MS Ingots, to make a pre-deposit of 25% of the duty involved within eight weeks, despite arguments of financial hardship and lack of concrete evidence presented. The case involved allegations of suppression of production and clandestine clearance, with the Department relying on input/output norms and comparisons of yield percentages. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the evidence presented but emphasized the importance of compliance with the order, indicating the balance dues would be waived, and recovery stayed during the Appeal's pendency. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249490