<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 526 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249489</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI, in a case involving M/s. Kalindi Ispat (P) Ltd., found a violation of principles of natural justice in the impugned order. The Tribunal noted the Revenue&#039;s failure to provide essential documents to the appellants, leading to an unfair adjudication process. Emphasizing the importance of disclosing necessary material to the assessee, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for a fresh decision, instructing the provision of all relevant documents and reconsideration of the appellants&#039; request for cross-examination. The case outcome prioritized upholding principles of natural justice for a fair resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 16:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 526 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249489</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI, in a case involving M/s. Kalindi Ispat (P) Ltd., found a violation of principles of natural justice in the impugned order. The Tribunal noted the Revenue&#039;s failure to provide essential documents to the appellants, leading to an unfair adjudication process. Emphasizing the importance of disclosing necessary material to the assessee, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for a fresh decision, instructing the provision of all relevant documents and reconsideration of the appellants&#039; request for cross-examination. The case outcome prioritized upholding principles of natural justice for a fair resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>