<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 516 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249479</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the deletion of Rs. 7,98,797/- and Rs. 12,29,404/- due to unverified commission payments and non-confirmation of creditors, respectively. However, the Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s relief of Rs. 3.76 lakhs on commission on sales under Section 40(a)(ia) and remanded the matter for further consideration of the remuneration disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 07:45:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 516 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249479</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the deletion of Rs. 7,98,797/- and Rs. 12,29,404/- due to unverified commission payments and non-confirmation of creditors, respectively. However, the Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s relief of Rs. 3.76 lakhs on commission on sales under Section 40(a)(ia) and remanded the matter for further consideration of the remuneration disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>