<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 515 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249478</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the Rs. 12,12,484 addition related to &#039;Other clearing expenses&#039; and the Rs. 4.53 crore enhancement under Section 40(a)(ia) for godown rent. The issue of reassessment proceedings was dismissed as it was not pursued. The judgment highlighted the significance of distinguishing between actual reimbursements and income elements in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 515 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249478</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the Rs. 12,12,484 addition related to &#039;Other clearing expenses&#039; and the Rs. 4.53 crore enhancement under Section 40(a)(ia) for godown rent. The issue of reassessment proceedings was dismissed as it was not pursued. The judgment highlighted the significance of distinguishing between actual reimbursements and income elements in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>