<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 514 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249477</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on the disallowance of interest and motorcar expenses, remanding the interest issue back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The tribunal also clarified the distinction between penalty and quantum proceedings, emphasizing the need to challenge penalty proceedings separately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 06:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 514 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249477</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on the disallowance of interest and motorcar expenses, remanding the interest issue back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The tribunal also clarified the distinction between penalty and quantum proceedings, emphasizing the need to challenge penalty proceedings separately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>