<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 506 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249469</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rectified a typographical error in reproducing grounds of appeal for AY 1999-2000, directing the CIT(A) to reconsider the ITA based on the original order. The assessee challenged additions like unexplained share application money, disallowance of expenses, and interest levies. The decision emphasized proper consideration of grounds and fresh assessment by the CIT(A), restoring both appeals for fresh review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 06:24:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 506 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249469</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rectified a typographical error in reproducing grounds of appeal for AY 1999-2000, directing the CIT(A) to reconsider the ITA based on the original order. The assessee challenged additions like unexplained share application money, disallowance of expenses, and interest levies. The decision emphasized proper consideration of grounds and fresh assessment by the CIT(A), restoring both appeals for fresh review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>