<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1275 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165454</link>
    <description>An assessee engaged in software development had claimed deduction under section 10B, but contended that the correct claim was deduction under section 10A and that the original reference to section 10B was only a technical mistake. The Tribunal noted that sections 10A and 10B operate on different conditions and that the lower authorities had not examined eligibility under section 10A at all. It held that the assessee could not be confined to the wrong claim alone and that the correct claim had to be examined on merits after giving an opportunity to place evidence. The matter was therefore remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration of entitlement under section 10A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 May 2023 17:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1275 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165454</link>
      <description>An assessee engaged in software development had claimed deduction under section 10B, but contended that the correct claim was deduction under section 10A and that the original reference to section 10B was only a technical mistake. The Tribunal noted that sections 10A and 10B operate on different conditions and that the lower authorities had not examined eligibility under section 10A at all. It held that the assessee could not be confined to the wrong claim alone and that the correct claim had to be examined on merits after giving an opportunity to place evidence. The matter was therefore remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration of entitlement under section 10A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>