https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249461 The Revenue filed an appeal against a service tax demand on the grounds that the assessee provided 'consulting engineer' services. The Appellate Commissioner ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the services provided did not fall under 'consulting engineer' service and excluded reimbursement of expenses from taxable value. The respondent argued that as a company registered under the Companies Act, it was not considered a 'consulting engineer' during the relevant period of 2001-03. The court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the respondent was not within the definition of 'consulting engineer'. en-us Thu, 15 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jan 2015 13:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249461 The Revenue filed an appeal against a service tax demand on the grounds that the assessee provided 'consulting engineer' services. The Appellate Commissioner ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the services provided did not fall under 'consulting engineer' service and excluded reimbursement of expenses from taxable value. The respondent argued that as a company registered under the Companies Act, it was not considered a 'consulting engineer' during the relevant period of 2001-03. The court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the respondent was not within the definition of 'consulting engineer'. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 15 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249461