<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 496 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249459</link>
    <description>The reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147/148 were upheld as valid. The disallowance of remuneration paid to partners under Section 40(b) was upheld due to the partnership deed not meeting statutory requirements. The penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) were dismissed, recognizing the bonafide nature of the assessee&#039;s claim. Final orders allowed ITA No. 4738 for A.Y. 2003-04 and ITA No. 4739 for A.Y. 2005-06, while ITA No. 4740 for A.Y. 2007-08 was dismissed. Cross objections were also dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 12:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 496 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249459</link>
      <description>The reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147/148 were upheld as valid. The disallowance of remuneration paid to partners under Section 40(b) was upheld due to the partnership deed not meeting statutory requirements. The penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) were dismissed, recognizing the bonafide nature of the assessee&#039;s claim. Final orders allowed ITA No. 4738 for A.Y. 2003-04 and ITA No. 4739 for A.Y. 2005-06, while ITA No. 4740 for A.Y. 2007-08 was dismissed. Cross objections were also dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>