<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 490 - PUNJAB TAX TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249453</link>
    <description>Retrospective deletion of a disqualifying entry from Schedule III meant the exemption application could not be ed solely on the basis of the deleted negative-list provision. The assessee&#039;s claim had to be reconsidered from the effective date of the amendment, because the legal disqualification stood removed retrospectively. The amended position nevertheless preserved the condition that the assessee must show it had not collected sales tax from customers, or else the amount collected had to be deposited with the State. The rejection was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh decision under the revised rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 11:00:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 490 - PUNJAB TAX TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249453</link>
      <description>Retrospective deletion of a disqualifying entry from Schedule III meant the exemption application could not be ed solely on the basis of the deleted negative-list provision. The assessee&#039;s claim had to be reconsidered from the effective date of the amendment, because the legal disqualification stood removed retrospectively. The amended position nevertheless preserved the condition that the assessee must show it had not collected sales tax from customers, or else the amount collected had to be deposited with the State. The rejection was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh decision under the revised rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>