<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 483 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249446</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellants&#039; request for a stay on the recovery of Central Excise duty demand and penalties during the appeal process due to factual discrepancies, lack of evidence, and contradictory statements by involved parties. The judgment emphasized the absence of evidence supporting the demand and highlighted contradictions in statements, leading to the unconditional waiver from pre-deposit of adjudged dues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 483 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249446</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellants&#039; request for a stay on the recovery of Central Excise duty demand and penalties during the appeal process due to factual discrepancies, lack of evidence, and contradictory statements by involved parties. The judgment emphasized the absence of evidence supporting the demand and highlighted contradictions in statements, leading to the unconditional waiver from pre-deposit of adjudged dues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>