<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 482 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249445</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, directing the Department to pay interest on delayed refunds as per Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant, despite earlier letters waiving interest, was deemed entitled to interest, as established by relevant Apex Court judgments. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred in dismissing appeals as time-barred, as the delays were justifiably due to seeking legal advice. The Tribunal emphasized that statutory rights to interest cannot be waived based on concessions made in letters to authorities, setting aside the Department&#039;s decision and ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 482 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249445</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, directing the Department to pay interest on delayed refunds as per Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant, despite earlier letters waiving interest, was deemed entitled to interest, as established by relevant Apex Court judgments. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred in dismissing appeals as time-barred, as the delays were justifiably due to seeking legal advice. The Tribunal emphasized that statutory rights to interest cannot be waived based on concessions made in letters to authorities, setting aside the Department&#039;s decision and ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>