https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249442 The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the application of Rule 6(3) without considering the practical challenges of maintaining separate accounts for common services was unreasonable. The appellant had already reversed proportionate credit as allowed by the retrospective amendment, resulting in a minimal amount due. The Tribunal deemed the impugned order unsustainable and waived the requirement of pre-deposit, interest, and penalty, staying the recovery pending the appeal's disposal. en-us Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Feb 2016 16:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249442 The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the application of Rule 6(3) without considering the practical challenges of maintaining separate accounts for common services was unreasonable. The appellant had already reversed proportionate credit as allowed by the retrospective amendment, resulting in a minimal amount due. The Tribunal deemed the impugned order unsustainable and waived the requirement of pre-deposit, interest, and penalty, staying the recovery pending the appeal's disposal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249442