<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 467 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249430</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, deleting the additions made by the AO and CIT(A) for both low household expenses and credits in bank accounts of other persons. The Tribunal referred to earlier Tribunal orders and emphasized the lack of supporting material for the additions. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the deletion of the sustained additions and restored the issues back to the AO for further investigation, following the precedent set by previous decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 09:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 467 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249430</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, deleting the additions made by the AO and CIT(A) for both low household expenses and credits in bank accounts of other persons. The Tribunal referred to earlier Tribunal orders and emphasized the lack of supporting material for the additions. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the deletion of the sustained additions and restored the issues back to the AO for further investigation, following the precedent set by previous decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>