<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 463 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249426</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals challenging the deletion of disallowance under section 80HHC for AYs 1999-2000 &amp;amp; 2003-04. It upheld the eligibility of the assessee for the deduction based on Supreme Court judgments but remitted the case to the Assessing Officer for recomputation in line with Gujarat High Court decisions. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of recalculating the deduction as per relevant court rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 09:46:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 463 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249426</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals challenging the deletion of disallowance under section 80HHC for AYs 1999-2000 &amp;amp; 2003-04. It upheld the eligibility of the assessee for the deduction based on Supreme Court judgments but remitted the case to the Assessing Officer for recomputation in line with Gujarat High Court decisions. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of recalculating the deduction as per relevant court rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>