<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 452 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249415</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded to the adjudicating authority for further examination and determination of the penalty issue under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s argument that the entire Service Tax, along with interest, was paid before the show cause notice was considered, while the Revenue&#039;s contention of non-deposit of recovered Service Tax was also taken into account. The matter required adjudication to assess the period of retention of Service Tax by the appellant accurately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2014 21:24:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 452 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249415</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded to the adjudicating authority for further examination and determination of the penalty issue under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s argument that the entire Service Tax, along with interest, was paid before the show cause notice was considered, while the Revenue&#039;s contention of non-deposit of recovered Service Tax was also taken into account. The matter required adjudication to assess the period of retention of Service Tax by the appellant accurately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>