<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 447 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249410</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI addressed an application for waiver of predeposit of tax, interest, and penalty by a manufacturer of aluminium rough castings and motor vehicle parts. The Tribunal found the applicant ineligible for CENVAT credit on warehousing charges post-clearance but directed a predeposit of Rs. 1,00,000 for one unit. The Tribunal noted discrepancies in the treatment of outward freight, emphasizing the importance of proper documentation to support claims. Recovery of balance dues was stayed during the appeal process, highlighting the need for thorough examination of evidence regarding delivery locations and pricing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2014 21:05:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 447 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249410</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI addressed an application for waiver of predeposit of tax, interest, and penalty by a manufacturer of aluminium rough castings and motor vehicle parts. The Tribunal found the applicant ineligible for CENVAT credit on warehousing charges post-clearance but directed a predeposit of Rs. 1,00,000 for one unit. The Tribunal noted discrepancies in the treatment of outward freight, emphasizing the importance of proper documentation to support claims. Recovery of balance dues was stayed during the appeal process, highlighting the need for thorough examination of evidence regarding delivery locations and pricing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>