<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 431 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249394</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, reinstating the addition of Rs. 55,00,000 as deemed income under Section 69B of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the significance of corroborative evidence in retracted confessions and upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s reliance on other material evidence. The penalty issue was remitted back to the CIT (Appeals) for independent reconsideration in light of the substantive proceedings&#039; outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 431 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249394</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, reinstating the addition of Rs. 55,00,000 as deemed income under Section 69B of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the significance of corroborative evidence in retracted confessions and upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s reliance on other material evidence. The penalty issue was remitted back to the CIT (Appeals) for independent reconsideration in light of the substantive proceedings&#039; outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>