<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 413 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249376</link>
    <description>The Tribunal acknowledged an oversight in not adjudicating grounds related to the valuation of goodwill and depreciation on goodwill in a tax matter. After reconsideration, following Supreme Court decisions allowing depreciation on goodwill as an intangible asset, the Tribunal allowed the claim for depreciation on goodwill. The decision was made in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the need to align with established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2014 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 413 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249376</link>
      <description>The Tribunal acknowledged an oversight in not adjudicating grounds related to the valuation of goodwill and depreciation on goodwill in a tax matter. After reconsideration, following Supreme Court decisions allowing depreciation on goodwill as an intangible asset, the Tribunal allowed the claim for depreciation on goodwill. The decision was made in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the need to align with established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>