https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5721 The article explains the proposed substitution of section 35F requiring mandatory percentage-based pre-deposit of the duty demanded or penalty as a condition for entertaining appeals, establishes a statutory ceiling on the deposit, excludes pending stay applications from its operation, and narrows the components included within "duty demanded," thereby replacing the prior discretionary hardship dispensation with a fixed pre-deposit regime. en-us Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:02:53 +0530 Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:02:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5721 The article explains the proposed substitution of section 35F requiring mandatory percentage-based pre-deposit of the duty demanded or penalty as a condition for entertaining appeals, establishes a statutory ceiling on the deposit, excludes pending stay applications from its operation, and narrows the components included within "duty demanded," thereby replacing the prior discretionary hardship dispensation with a fixed pre-deposit regime. Articles Central Excise Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:02:53 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5721