<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 412 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249375</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, ruling in favor of the respondent on both issues. The repair and maintenance services provided were not taxable as they lacked contractual agreements, and the fabrication and installation of steel structures did not qualify as Business Auxiliary Service under the relevant legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2015 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 412 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249375</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, ruling in favor of the respondent on both issues. The repair and maintenance services provided were not taxable as they lacked contractual agreements, and the fabrication and installation of steel structures did not qualify as Business Auxiliary Service under the relevant legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>