<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 408 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249371</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order demanding service tax and penalties, requiring the appellants to deposit Rs. 10 lakhs within 10 weeks for a proper defense. Failure to comply would lead to enforcement of the demand. The case was remanded to allow the appellants to present their case effectively before the Commissioner, emphasizing the need for clear documentation and explanations. The decision aimed to grant the appellants an opportunity to address the allegations adequately, taking into account the amount already paid and the remaining liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 408 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249371</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order demanding service tax and penalties, requiring the appellants to deposit Rs. 10 lakhs within 10 weeks for a proper defense. Failure to comply would lead to enforcement of the demand. The case was remanded to allow the appellants to present their case effectively before the Commissioner, emphasizing the need for clear documentation and explanations. The decision aimed to grant the appellants an opportunity to address the allegations adequately, taking into account the amount already paid and the remaining liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>