<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 402 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249365</link>
    <description>Where clandestine removal is established and duty evasion is not disputed, penalty under Section 11AC is equal to the duty evaded, and the 25% reduced penalty under the proviso is available only if duty, interest and penalty are paid within the stipulated time after the order-in-original. Because that option had been expressly granted but not exercised in time, reduction at the appellate stage was rejected and the unit&#039;s penalty was upheld. A personal penalty under Rule 26 cannot be sustained without evidence linking the employee to the clandestine clearances; in the absence of such material, the manager&#039;s penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2015 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 402 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249365</link>
      <description>Where clandestine removal is established and duty evasion is not disputed, penalty under Section 11AC is equal to the duty evaded, and the 25% reduced penalty under the proviso is available only if duty, interest and penalty are paid within the stipulated time after the order-in-original. Because that option had been expressly granted but not exercised in time, reduction at the appellate stage was rejected and the unit&#039;s penalty was upheld. A personal penalty under Rule 26 cannot be sustained without evidence linking the employee to the clandestine clearances; in the absence of such material, the manager&#039;s penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>