<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 384 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249347</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer for a comprehensive review, emphasizing the importance of considering all relevant valuation reports and legal precedents to determine the fair market value for computing capital gains tax. The decision aimed at ensuring consistency and accuracy in assessing property values, highlighting the need for a detailed examination of valuation reports and adherence to established principles in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 384 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249347</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer for a comprehensive review, emphasizing the importance of considering all relevant valuation reports and legal precedents to determine the fair market value for computing capital gains tax. The decision aimed at ensuring consistency and accuracy in assessing property values, highlighting the need for a detailed examination of valuation reports and adherence to established principles in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>