<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 374 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249337</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, confirming the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the addition of Rs. 3,04,500 but deleting it for the addition of Rs. 7,58,233. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of providing specific reasons in penalty orders and properly considering the assessee&#039;s explanations to uphold the principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 08:04:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 374 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249337</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, confirming the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the addition of Rs. 3,04,500 but deleting it for the addition of Rs. 7,58,233. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of providing specific reasons in penalty orders and properly considering the assessee&#039;s explanations to uphold the principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>