<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (9) TMI 229 - Andhra Pradesh High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165448</link>
    <description>Blending coffee powder with chicory powder to make French Coffee was treated as manufacture because the process produced a commercially distinct article with a separate identity, name, character and use; the blended product therefore fell within the residuary excise entry under Item No. 68, in favour of Revenue. The exemption for food products or food preparations under Notification No. 55/75-C.E. did not apply because coffee was specifically classified under Item No. 2 and the mixture did not satisfy the notification&#039;s description; the assessee did not discharge the burden of showing entitlement to exemption, again in favour of Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 11:20:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (9) TMI 229 - Andhra Pradesh High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165448</link>
      <description>Blending coffee powder with chicory powder to make French Coffee was treated as manufacture because the process produced a commercially distinct article with a separate identity, name, character and use; the blended product therefore fell within the residuary excise entry under Item No. 68, in favour of Revenue. The exemption for food products or food preparations under Notification No. 55/75-C.E. did not apply because coffee was specifically classified under Item No. 2 and the mixture did not satisfy the notification&#039;s description; the assessee did not discharge the burden of showing entitlement to exemption, again in favour of Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>