<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 370 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249333</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that services provided by the Respondent to their subsidiaries qualified as &#039;Management Consultancy Services&#039; under the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal found a service provider and client relationship between the parties, rejecting the Department&#039;s argument. Penalties under various sections were deemed inapplicable to the Respondent. The service tax demands within the normal limitation period were upheld, with interest imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2015 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 370 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249333</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that services provided by the Respondent to their subsidiaries qualified as &#039;Management Consultancy Services&#039; under the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal found a service provider and client relationship between the parties, rejecting the Department&#039;s argument. Penalties under various sections were deemed inapplicable to the Respondent. The service tax demands within the normal limitation period were upheld, with interest imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>