<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 364 - CESTAT  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249327</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s flying training activities are covered under &quot;commercial coaching or training service,&quot; making them liable for service tax. Additionally, the repair and maintenance services for the Government of Tamil Nadu&#039;s aircrafts were deemed taxable. The rental income from providing hangars for parking aircrafts and helicopters was also subject to service tax under &quot;Airport Service.&quot; The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit a specified amount within a timeframe, failing which the predeposit requirement for the remaining service tax demand, interest, and penalty would stand, with recovery stayed during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 364 - CESTAT  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249327</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s flying training activities are covered under &quot;commercial coaching or training service,&quot; making them liable for service tax. Additionally, the repair and maintenance services for the Government of Tamil Nadu&#039;s aircrafts were deemed taxable. The rental income from providing hangars for parking aircrafts and helicopters was also subject to service tax under &quot;Airport Service.&quot; The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit a specified amount within a timeframe, failing which the predeposit requirement for the remaining service tax demand, interest, and penalty would stand, with recovery stayed during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>