<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 361 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249324</link>
    <description>Cancellation of registration could not be sustained solely because proof of tax payment was not produced before the lower authorities when the record indicated payment and the supporting documents were later filed at the appellate stage. The controversy turned on verification of that payment, so the refusal to consider the material was unjustified. The appeal also could not be dismissed without adequate opportunity to place the relevant evidence on record, particularly where the claim of tax payment went to the root of the dispute. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter remitted for fresh decision after considering the documents and the tax payment claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 10:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 361 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249324</link>
      <description>Cancellation of registration could not be sustained solely because proof of tax payment was not produced before the lower authorities when the record indicated payment and the supporting documents were later filed at the appellate stage. The controversy turned on verification of that payment, so the refusal to consider the material was unjustified. The appeal also could not be dismissed without adequate opportunity to place the relevant evidence on record, particularly where the claim of tax payment went to the root of the dispute. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter remitted for fresh decision after considering the documents and the tax payment claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>