<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 359 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249322</link>
    <description>The judge ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving excess stock and shortage of goods detected during a factory visit. The judgment overturned the confiscation of excess goods and raw-materials, except for a reduction in the demand related to short found zinc. The judge found flaws in the stock taking process and highlighted the lack of justification for confiscating raw-materials not manufactured by the appellants. The confirmation of demand based on alleged clandestine removal without evidence was also deemed unjustified. The appeal was allowed, granting the appellants consequential relief based on established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 359 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249322</link>
      <description>The judge ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving excess stock and shortage of goods detected during a factory visit. The judgment overturned the confiscation of excess goods and raw-materials, except for a reduction in the demand related to short found zinc. The judge found flaws in the stock taking process and highlighted the lack of justification for confiscating raw-materials not manufactured by the appellants. The confirmation of demand based on alleged clandestine removal without evidence was also deemed unjustified. The appeal was allowed, granting the appellants consequential relief based on established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>