<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 354 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249317</link>
    <description>The appeals were filed seeking a stay on the Commissioner&#039;s order confirming duty against entities and imposing penalties for fraudulent activities involving passing on cenvat credit through bogus invoices. Investigations revealed multiple parties&#039; involvement in the scheme, supported by discrepancies in records. The appellants denied involvement, but the Revenue upheld penalties based on conclusive findings. The judgment favored the Revenue due to illegal activities, directing specific appellants to deposit penalties pending appeal disposal. Partial deposits were ordered for others, with the balance pending final resolution by the Tribunal. Stay applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 354 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249317</link>
      <description>The appeals were filed seeking a stay on the Commissioner&#039;s order confirming duty against entities and imposing penalties for fraudulent activities involving passing on cenvat credit through bogus invoices. Investigations revealed multiple parties&#039; involvement in the scheme, supported by discrepancies in records. The appellants denied involvement, but the Revenue upheld penalties based on conclusive findings. The judgment favored the Revenue due to illegal activities, directing specific appellants to deposit penalties pending appeal disposal. Partial deposits were ordered for others, with the balance pending final resolution by the Tribunal. Stay applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>