<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 347 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249310</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondent to consider the refund application in light of ITAT orders, verify Mr. Kandhar&#039;s tax payments, provide reasons for any denial of refund, and dispose of the application within 12 weeks while keeping all contentions open. The petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 09:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 347 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249310</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondent to consider the refund application in light of ITAT orders, verify Mr. Kandhar&#039;s tax payments, provide reasons for any denial of refund, and dispose of the application within 12 weeks while keeping all contentions open. The petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>