<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 336 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249299</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 5.95 lakhs made under section 69C of the Act. The decision was based on a precedent involving a vendor where a similar mistake in accounting was rectified, leading to the deletion of the addition. The Tribunal found that the error was corrected, and there was no justification for the addition in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 336 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249299</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 5.95 lakhs made under section 69C of the Act. The decision was based on a precedent involving a vendor where a similar mistake in accounting was rectified, leading to the deletion of the addition. The Tribunal found that the error was corrected, and there was no justification for the addition in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>