<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 314 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249277</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding the impugned order in its entirety, except for the abatement of the penalty imposed on the deceased Director. The judgment emphasized the substantial corroborative evidence supporting the findings of clandestine manufacture and removal of goods without payment of duty and the lack of prejudice caused by the denial of cross-examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 14:11:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 314 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249277</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding the impugned order in its entirety, except for the abatement of the penalty imposed on the deceased Director. The judgment emphasized the substantial corroborative evidence supporting the findings of clandestine manufacture and removal of goods without payment of duty and the lack of prejudice caused by the denial of cross-examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>