https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249274 The court upheld the demand for proportionate CENVAT credit on input services for exempted products due to non-compliance with Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004. The invocation of the extended recovery period was justified as the assessee failed to reverse the credit or pay the required amount under Rule 6(3). The Tribunal rejected the appeal, except for reducing the payable amount by the credit attributable to specific services allowed under Rule 6(5). en-us Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Jul 2014 13:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249274 The court upheld the demand for proportionate CENVAT credit on input services for exempted products due to non-compliance with Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004. The invocation of the extended recovery period was justified as the assessee failed to reverse the credit or pay the required amount under Rule 6(3). The Tribunal rejected the appeal, except for reducing the payable amount by the credit attributable to specific services allowed under Rule 6(5). Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249274