<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 305 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249268</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal against the order of the CIT(A) upholding the AO&#039;s rejection of the application under section 154 of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal held that there was no mistake apparent from the record that could be rectified under section 154. Despite the dismissal, the ITAT Mumbai allowed the exclusion of the period consumed in pursuing the litigation for calculating the limitation period if the appellant decides to file an appeal before the CIT(A) against the assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 305 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249268</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal against the order of the CIT(A) upholding the AO&#039;s rejection of the application under section 154 of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal held that there was no mistake apparent from the record that could be rectified under section 154. Despite the dismissal, the ITAT Mumbai allowed the exclusion of the period consumed in pursuing the litigation for calculating the limitation period if the appellant decides to file an appeal before the CIT(A) against the assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>