https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165444 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 is limited by the location and amenability of the authority against whom effective relief is sought. Where the final operative order is made by a central authority outside the High Court's territorial reach, relief cannot be granted against the local antecedent order alone if the later outside order remains outstanding. Under the Mineral Concession Rules, 1949, the Central Government's review order was the final and effective determination, and the State Government's earlier refusal did not survive independently. The result was that the writ court had no territorial jurisdiction to quash the final order, and the statutory scheme made the Central Government's decision conclusive. en-us Fri, 16 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Aug 2014 11:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165444 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 is limited by the location and amenability of the authority against whom effective relief is sought. Where the final operative order is made by a central authority outside the High Court's territorial reach, relief cannot be granted against the local antecedent order alone if the later outside order remains outstanding. Under the Mineral Concession Rules, 1949, the Central Government's review order was the final and effective determination, and the State Government's earlier refusal did not survive independently. The result was that the writ court had no territorial jurisdiction to quash the final order, and the statutory scheme made the Central Government's decision conclusive. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165444