https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249247 A claim for 67% abatement under Notification No. 1/2006-S.T. in relation to erection, commissioning or installation service had not been examined by the adjudicating authority. The record also showed that the report obtained by the appellate authority was supplied at the hearing, but the appellant sought time and a further opportunity to respond. In these circumstances, the impugned orders were set aside and the matters were remanded for fresh adjudication after furnishing the report and granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing. en-us Mon, 10 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jul 2014 14:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249247 A claim for 67% abatement under Notification No. 1/2006-S.T. in relation to erection, commissioning or installation service had not been examined by the adjudicating authority. The record also showed that the report obtained by the appellate authority was supplied at the hearing, but the appellant sought time and a further opportunity to respond. In these circumstances, the impugned orders were set aside and the matters were remanded for fresh adjudication after furnishing the report and granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 10 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249247