<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 283 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249246</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit of service tax, interest and penalty was waived and recovery stayed in a dispute concerning renting of immovable property service. The Tribunal noted that the applicants were already registered and paying service tax on rent, and found no evidence that the security deposit had affected the rent received. It also relied on the earlier stay order placed before it. On that basis, the stay petition was allowed and the appeal was directed to be listed for regular hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2014 14:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 283 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249246</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit of service tax, interest and penalty was waived and recovery stayed in a dispute concerning renting of immovable property service. The Tribunal noted that the applicants were already registered and paying service tax on rent, and found no evidence that the security deposit had affected the rent received. It also relied on the earlier stay order placed before it. On that basis, the stay petition was allowed and the appeal was directed to be listed for regular hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>