https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249237 The appeals arose from orders concerning the confiscation of excess goods during visits to the appellant's factory by Central Excise officers. The appellant disputed the physical verification process and lack of evidence for malafide intent. The judge emphasized the need for evidence of malafide intent for confiscation, citing legal precedents. As a result, the impugned orders were set aside, and both appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants. en-us Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249237 The appeals arose from orders concerning the confiscation of excess goods during visits to the appellant's factory by Central Excise officers. The appellant disputed the physical verification process and lack of evidence for malafide intent. The judge emphasized the need for evidence of malafide intent for confiscation, citing legal precedents. As a result, the impugned orders were set aside, and both appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249237