<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 273 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249236</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the confiscation of television sets and imposition of penalties on transporters. It was held that without evidence of duty evasion by the manufacturers, the confiscation of the sets and penalties on the transporters were unjustified. The tribunal set aside the orders for confiscation and penalties, allowing both appeals in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 273 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249236</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the confiscation of television sets and imposition of penalties on transporters. It was held that without evidence of duty evasion by the manufacturers, the confiscation of the sets and penalties on the transporters were unjustified. The tribunal set aside the orders for confiscation and penalties, allowing both appeals in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>