https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249235 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand, interest imposition, and penalty imposed on the appellants for determining the assessable value of physicians samples under Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, emphasizing that the value should be based on the transaction value rather than a notional value, citing precedent decisions supporting this approach. The decision underscored the importance of adhering to legal provisions and precedent decisions for accurate valuation in excise duty matters. en-us Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jul 2014 09:44:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249235 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand, interest imposition, and penalty imposed on the appellants for determining the assessable value of physicians samples under Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, emphasizing that the value should be based on the transaction value rather than a notional value, citing precedent decisions supporting this approach. The decision underscored the importance of adhering to legal provisions and precedent decisions for accurate valuation in excise duty matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249235