<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 256 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249219</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, allowing the netting off of interest income against expenditure incurred for earning exempt income. The Tribunal found a direct nexus between the loan, interest payments, interest received, and investments, supporting the assessee&#039;s approach. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D was dismissed, affirming the validity of the netting off method utilized by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2014 08:49:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=359001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 256 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249219</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, allowing the netting off of interest income against expenditure incurred for earning exempt income. The Tribunal found a direct nexus between the loan, interest payments, interest received, and investments, supporting the assessee&#039;s approach. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D was dismissed, affirming the validity of the netting off method utilized by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>