<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 250 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249213</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of both assesses, ruling in favor of the assessee by deleting the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(b) of the IT Act for the respective Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2011-12. The penalties were deemed unjustified as the assessee was not provided adequate time to comply and had cooperated during the assessment proceedings, leading to the deletion of penalties in all cases due to similar circumstances across the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 250 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249213</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of both assesses, ruling in favor of the assessee by deleting the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(b) of the IT Act for the respective Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2011-12. The penalties were deemed unjustified as the assessee was not provided adequate time to comply and had cooperated during the assessment proceedings, leading to the deletion of penalties in all cases due to similar circumstances across the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>